Today: Dec 21, 2024
RU / EN
Last update: Oct 30, 2024
Histological Response of Oral Mucosa on Fractional Laser Photothermolysis in Animal Experiments

Histological Response of Oral Mucosa on Fractional Laser Photothermolysis in Animal Experiments

Gladkova N.D., Feldstein F.I., Karabut М.М., Ostrovskaya Y.V., Snopova L.B., Kiseleva Е.B., Romanos G.E.
Key words: oral mucosa, fractional laser photothermolysis, regeneration.
2012, issue 3, page 7.

Full text

pdf
0
1735

The aim of the investigation is to prove the supposition that gingival treated by fractional laser photothermolysis is able to initiate regeneration of gingival tissues due to the stimulation of fibroblasts formation, new collagen and vascular structure growth, and complete gingival healing.

Materials and Methods. There has been used an original laser system of “Dental Photonics” based on diode laser with wave length of 980 nm generating radiation, with radiation power being up to 20 Watt to perform fractional laser photothermolysis. Each column of microcoagulation was formed in exposure time of 80, 120 or 150 ms. The experiments have been carried out on 18 healthy rabbits. The animals have undergone in vivo laser treatment, and then have been followed up within 90 days.

Results. A single fractional laser photothermolysis procedure with wave length of 980 nm and optimal pulse length of 150 ms was found to induce oral mucosa regeneration till health tissue structure. In healing process, new tissue is characterized by increased blood supply and fibroblasts concentration with no fibrosis signs.

Conclusion. The obtained data enable to consider fractional laser photothermolysis as prospective technique of the treatment of oral soft tissue diseases.

  1. Altshuler G., Smirnov M., Yaroslavsky I. et al. Lattice of optical islets: a novel treatment modality in photomedicine. Journal of Physics D (Applied Physics) 2005; 38(15): 2732–2747.
  2. Manstein D., Herron G.S., Sink R.K. et al. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34(5): 426–438.
  3. Moretti M. Fractional skin rejuvenation: a major new technology category. Medical Insight, Inc.; 2008.
  4. Bedi V.P., Chan K.F., Sink R.K. et al. The effects of pulse energy variations on the dimensions of microscopic thermal treatment zones in nonablative fractional resurfacing. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39: 145–155.
  5. Szpaderska A.M., Zuckerman J.D., DiPietro L.A. Differential injury responses in oral mucosal and cutaneous wounds. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 621–626.
  6. Jih M.H., Goldberg L.H., Kimyai-Asadi A. Fractional photothermolysis for photoaging of hands. Dermatol Surg 2008 Jan; 34(1): 73–78.
  7. Laubach H.-J., Tannous Z., Anderson R.R. et al. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38: 142–149.
  8. Baranoski S., Ayello E.A. Wound care essentials: practice principles. Philadelphia, PA–London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008; 479 p.
Gladkova N.D., Feldstein F.I., Karabut М.М., Ostrovskaya Y.V., Snopova L.B., Kiseleva Е.B., Romanos G.E. Histological Response of Oral Mucosa on Fractional Laser Photothermolysis in Animal Experiments. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2012; (3): 7


Journal in Databases

pubmed_logo.jpg

web_of_science.jpg

scopus.jpg

crossref.jpg

ebsco.jpg

embase.jpg

ulrich.jpg

cyberleninka.jpg

e-library.jpg

lan.jpg

ajd.jpg

SCImago Journal & Country Rank