Today: Dec 21, 2024
RU / EN
Last update: Oct 30, 2024
Augmentation of Pedicle Screws Using Bone Grafting in Patients with Spinal Osteoporosis

Augmentation of Pedicle Screws Using Bone Grafting in Patients with Spinal Osteoporosis

Bokov A.E., Bulkin A.A., Bratsev I.S., Kalinina S.Ya., Mlyavykh S.G., Anderson D.G.
Key words: pedicle screw fixation; pedicle screw instability; vertebral augmentation; bone cement; low bone density; polymethyl methacrylate.
2021, volume 13, issue 5, page 6.

Full text

html pdf
1566
1409

The aim of the study was to develop a new method of vertebral augmentation based on autologous and allogeneic bone chips to be used in pedicle screw fixation and to compare this method with the technique based on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).

Materials and Methods. This prospective non-randomized study included 164 patients with degenerative pathologies or traumatic injuries of the lumbar spine and transitional thoracolumbar segments; 153 of the operated patients were followed up for 18 months. In these patients, radiodensity of the cancellous bone tissue was below 110 HU by the Hounsfield scale. Patients with degenerative spinal disorders underwent pedicle screw fixation using transforaminal interbody fusion; patients with traumatic spinal injuries underwent intermediate pedicle screw fixation, and those with a loss of vertebral body height by >50% underwent anterior fusion.

The patients were divided into three groups: in group 1 (n=39), bone tissue augmentation was performed using PMMA; in group 2 (n=21), augmentation was done with bone chips; in group 3 (n=93), no augmentation was performed (control group). The follow-up period was 12 months; cases with fixator breakage or loosening were recorded.

Results. After augmentation with PMMA, 11 cases (28.2%) of fixator destabilization were detected. With bone chips, fixator instability developed in 2 patients (9.5%) only, whereas in patients operated without augmentation, the instability was observed in 43 cases (46.2%). With PMMA augmentation, the incidence rate of fixator destabilization did not significantly differ from that in the control group (p=0.0801), while the use of bone chips resulted in a statistically significant decrease of this index compared to the control group (p=0.0023). A logistic regression analysis confirmed the superiority of the developed method over the PMMA-based vertebral augmentation.

Conclusion. The use of bone chips for vertebral augmentation provides a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of pedicle screw fixator destabilization in the post-operative period. By reducing the risk of proximal loosening and eliminating the risk of bone cement drainage into the spinal canal and vascular bed, the proposed method may become especially effective in patients with impaired bone density.

  1. Li B., Sun C., Zhao C., Yao X., Zhang Y., Duan H., Hao J., Guo X., Fan B., Ning G., Feng S. Epidemiological profile of thoracolumbar fracture (TLF) over a period of 10 years in Tianjin, China. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42(2): 178–183, https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2018.1455018.
  2. Jensen R.K., Jensen T.S., Koes B., Hartvigsen J. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2020; 29(9): 2143–2163, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1.
  3. Wu Z.X., Gong F.T., Liu L., Ma Z.S., Zhang Y., Zhao X., Yang M., Lei W., Sang H.X. A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132(4): 471–476, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1439-6.
  4. Rollinghoff M., Schluter-Brust K., Groos D., Sobottke R., Michael J.W., Eysel P., Delank K.S. Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2010; 2(1): e3, https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2010.e3.
  5. Zou D., Sun Z., Zhou S., Zhong W., Li W. Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the T-score of DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 2020; 29(5): 1105–1111, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06386-8.
  6. Shea T.M., Laun J., Gonzalez-Blohm S.A., Doulgeris J.J., Lee W.E., Aghayev K., Vrionis F.D. Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 748393, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/748393.
  7. Krueger A., Bliemel C., Zettl R., Ruchholtz S. Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(9): 1257–1265, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1073-y.
  8. Donaldson A.J., Thomson H.E., Harper N.J., Kenny N.W. Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102(1): 12–22, https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen328.
  9. Guo H.Z., Tang Y.C., Guo D.Q., Zhang S.C., Li Y.X., Mo G.Y., Luo P.J., Zhou T.P., Ma Y.H., Liang D., Jiang X.B. The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 2019; 28(7): 1661–1669, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05985-4.
  10. Leone A., Guglielmi G., Cassar-Pullicino V.N., Bonomo L. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 2007; 245(1): 62–77, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051359.
  11. Galbusera F., Volkheimer D., Reitmaier S., Berger-Roscher N., Kienle A., Wilke H.J. Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 2015; 24(5): 1005–1016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6.
  12. Gothard D., Smith E.L., Kanczler J.M., Rashidi H., Qutachi O., Henstock J., Rotherham M., El Haj A., Shakesheff K.M., Oreffo R.O. Tissue engineered bone using select growth factors: a comprehensive review of animal studies and clinical translation studies in man. Eur Cell Mater 2014; 28: 166–208, https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v028a13.
  13. Schwaiger B.J., Gersing A.S., Baum T., Noel P.B., Zimmer C., Bauer J.S. Bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT predict osteoporotic vertebral fractures and screw loosening. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35(8): 1628–1633, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3893.
  14. Zaidi Q., Danisa O.A., Cheng W. Measurement techniques and utility of Hounsfield unit values for assessment of bone quality prior to spinal instrumentation: a review of current literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44(4): E239–E244, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002813.
  15. Kueny R.A., Kolb J.P., Lehmann W., Puschel K., Morlock M.M., Huber G. Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 2014; 23: 2196–2202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3476-7.
  16. Bostelmann R., Keiler A., Steiger H.J., Scholz A., Cornelius J.F., Schmoelz W. Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading. Eur Spine J 2017; 26(1): 181–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3.
  17. Weiser L., Huber G., Sellenschloh K., Viezens L., Puschel K., Morlock M.M., Lehmann W. Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density. Eur Spine J 2018; 27(8): 1964–1971, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5660-7.
  18. Choy W.J., Walsh W.R., Phan K., Mobbs R.J. Technical note: pedicle cement augmentation with proximal screw toggle and loosening. Orthop Surg 2019; 11(3): 510–515, https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12467.
  19. Pfeifer B.A., Krag M.H., Johnson C. Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19(3): 350–353, https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199402000-00017.
  20. Jia C., Zhang R., Xing T., Gao H., Li H., Dong F., Zhang J., Ge P., Song P., Xu P., Zhang H., Shen C. Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts. Spine J 2019; 19(8): 1443–1452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.013.
  21. Bokov A.E., Mlyavykh S.G., Aleynik A.Ya., Bulkin A.A., Kulakova K.V. Method of stabilization of the spinal-motion segment with transpedicular instruments in patients with osteoporosis of spine. Patent RU 2663940. 2018.
Bokov A.E., Bulkin A.A., Bratsev I.S., Kalinina S.Ya., Mlyavykh S.G., Anderson D.G. Augmentation of Pedicle Screws Using Bone Grafting in Patients with Spinal Osteoporosis. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2021; 13(5): 6, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.01


Journal in Databases

pubmed_logo.jpg

web_of_science.jpg

scopus.jpg

crossref.jpg

ebsco.jpg

embase.jpg

ulrich.jpg

cyberleninka.jpg

e-library.jpg

lan.jpg

ajd.jpg

SCImago Journal & Country Rank