Minimally Invasive (Epivastus) Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty

The aim of the study was to assess the efficiency of a developed minimally invasive (epivastus) approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing its early results with those of a standard medial mediapatellar approach (MMPA).

Materials and Methods. A single-center, comparative randomized prospective study involved 127 patients, who underwent TKA using MMPA (n=62) and a modified minimally invasive epivastus approach (n=65) within the period from January to December, 2022. The study groups were comparable by gender, age, BMI, gonarthrosis stage, and knee joint functioning parameters.

Results. The surgery duration in the epivastus group was significantly lower compared to MMPA group (p<0.001). However, the interpretation of tissue trauma markers assessment appeared rather ambiguous. There were no statistically significant differences in lactate dehydrogenase (p=0.253). C-reactive protein, myoglobin, creatinine showed a significant increase in MMPA group (p<0.001; p=0.002 and p=0.048, respectively), while aspartate aminotransferase, creatine phosphokinase and ESR, in contrast, increased in the epivastus group (p<0.001; p=0.024 and p=0.010, respectively). Pain syndrome determined by VAS 3 days after the surgery was significantly lower in the epivastus group (p=0.006). The extent of blood loss appeared to be much greater in MMPA group (p=0.006). The joint function indicators on day 3 after the surgery were found to be better in the patients after TKA using an epivastus approach (p<0.001). The postoperative assessment of the endoprosthetic spatial orientation showed the indicators characterizing the correct endoprosthetic implantation to be comparable in both groups (p≥0.06).

Conclusion. The present study demonstrated the efficiency of the developed minimally invasive (epivastus) approach in TKA. However, it should be taken into consideration that surgeons should take a training course to be able to accomplish a high-quality approach.

An ambiguous interpretation of tissue trauma markers assessment of performing minimally traumatic approaches requires terminology correction. It is probably necessary to change the approach to the approach marking and use the terms specifying minimal invasiveness and the reduction of muscle injury rather than soft tissues in general.

1. Rukovodstvo po pervichnomu endoprotezirovaniyu kolennogo sustava [Guidelines for primary knee arthroplasty]. Kulyaba T.A., Kornilov N.N., Tikhilov R.M. (editors). Saint Petersburg: NMITs TO im. R.R. Vredena; 2021; 583 p.
2. Russian Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists. Russian Association of Rheumatologists. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii “Gonartroz” (utv. Minzdravom Rossii) [Clinical recommendations “Gonarthrosis” (approved by the Ministry of Health of Russia)]. September 3, 2021.
3. Fil A.S., Tarakanov V.N., Kulyaba T.A., Kornilov N.N. Primary knee joint arthroplasty trends at the Vreden National Medical Research Centre for Traumatology and Orthopedics compared with other national joint replacement registries. Is our way similar? Genij ortopedii 2020; 26(4): 476–483.
4. Irzhanskiy A.A., Kornilov N.N., Kulyaba T.A., Kochergin P.G. Evaluation of patient’s expectations with the results of primary knee arthroplasty. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovania 2020; 6: 148, https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30337.
5. Tikhilov R.M., Kornilov N.N., Saraev A.V., Kulyaba T.A. Sovremennyy vzglyad na patogenez bolevogo sindroma posle artroplastiki kolennogo sustava (obzor literatury). V kn.: Novye gorizonty travmatologii i ortopedii [A modern view on the pathogenesis of pain after knee arthroplasty (literature review). In: New horizons of traumatology and orthopedics]. Saint Petersburg; 2017; p. 109–112.
6. Kärrholm J., Mohaddes M., Odin D., Vinblad J., Rogmark C., Rolfson O. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2017. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty; 2017, https://doi.org/10.18158/bkoffx7u4.
7. Migliorini F., Aretini P., Driessen A., El Mansy Y., Quack V., Tingart M., Eschweiler J. Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30(6): 979–992, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9.
8. Migliorini F., Eschweiler J., Baroncini A., Tingart M., Maffulli N. Better outcomes after minimally invasive surgeries compared to the standard invasive medial parapatelar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29(11): 3608–3620, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06306-9.
9. Zhang L., Li X., Rüwald J.M., Welle K., Schildberg F.A., Kabir K. Comparison of minimally invasive approaches and standard median parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Technol Health Care 2021; 29(3): 557–574, https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-192078.
10. Sabatini L., Nicolaci G., Atzori F., Oliva A., Aprato A., Terzolo M., Masse’ A. Biochemical stress evaluation after medial parapatellar and subvastus approach in total knee replacement. Musculoskelet Surg 2018; 102(2): 185–190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0521-9.
11. Li Z., Cheng W., Sun L., Yao Y., Cao Q., Ye S., Qi L., Xu S., Wu X., Jing J. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Orthop 2018; 42(3): 543–549, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3703-z.
12. Donovan R.L., Lostis E., Jones I., Whitehouse M.R. Estimation of blood volume and blood loss in primary total hip and knee replacement: an analysis of formulae for perioperative calculations and their ability to predict length of stay and blood transfusion requirements. J Orthop 2021; 24: 227–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.004.
13. Honsawek S., Deepaisarnsakul B., Tanavalee A., Sakdinakiattikoon M., Ngarmukos S., Preativatanyou K., Bumrungpanichthaworn P. Relationship of serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and knee skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Int Orthop 2011; 35(1): 31–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-0973-0.
14. Schroer W.C., Diesfeld P.J., LeMarr A., Reedy M.E. Applicability of the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty technique: an analysis of 725 cases with mean 2-year follow-up. J Surg Orthop Adv 2007; 16(3): 131–137.
15. Niki Y., Mochizuki T., Momohara S., Saito S., Toyama Y., Matsumoto H. Is minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty really minimally invasive surgery? J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(4): 499–504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.002.
16. Huang Z., Shen B., Ma J., Yang J., Zhou Z., Kang P., Pei F. Mini-midvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in TKA: muscle damage and inflammation markers. Orthopedics 2012; 35(7): e1038–e1045, https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20120621-17.
17. Pan W.M., Li X.G., Tang T.S., Qian Z.L., Zhang Q., Zhang C.M. Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res 2010; 38(3): 890–900, https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315.

Sokolovskii S.E., Zykin A.A., Rukina N.N., Malyshev E.E. Minimally Invasive (Epivastus) Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2023; 15(4): 23, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2023.15.4.02