Reactivity of Neutrophil-Like HL-60 Cells towards Persistent Forms of Escherichia coli

The aim was to study the reactivity of neutrophil-like HL-60 cells towards native E. coli and E. coli persisters by measuring the intensity of their respiratory burst.

Materials and Methods. Persistent forms (persisters) of E. coli were obtained by sequential incubation of bacteria in solutions of 3-chlorophenylhydrazone carbonyl cyanide (CCCP) and ciprofloxacin. Differentiated cells of the HL-60 line (ATCC CCL-240) were used as neutrophil-like cells. The reactive respiratory burst of neutrophil-like cells in response to native E. coli or E. coli persisters was evaluated by measuring fluorescence of the oxidized form of Amplex Red using an Infinite M200 microplate reader.

Results. The number of viable E. coli before and after incubation with the CCCP and ciprofloxacin was approximately the same, thus confirming the presence of persistent forms of E. coli. Native E. coli cells caused a statistically significant increase in respiratory burst of neutrophil-like cells reaching 14±4% of the positive control values (in the negative control, the values were 6±3%). The respiratory burst intensity of neutrophil-like cells mixed with E. coli persisters was significantly higher than that observed with native E. coli, and accounted for 42±7% of the positive control.

Conclusion. Persists of E. coli can stimulate the respiratory metabolism of phagocytic neutrophil-like cells of the HL-60 line. The ability of these persisters to induce a respiratory burst of neutrophils is significantly greater than that of native E. coli bacteria.

1. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po antiinfektsionnoy khimioterapii [A practical guide to anti-infectious chemotherapy]. Pod red. Strachunskogo L.S., Belousova Yu.B., Kozlova S.N. [Strachunskiy L.S., Belousov Yu.B., Kozlov S.N. (editors)]. Smolensk: NIIAKh SGMA; 2002; 586 p.
2. Chebotar I.V., Mayansky А.N., Konchakova Е.D., Lazareva А.V., Chistyakova V.P. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya 2012; 14(1): 51–58.
3. Lewis K. Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 2010; 64(1): 357–372, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306.
4. Evdokimova N.V., Tchernenkaya T.V. Persister microbial cells: a novel view on the old problem. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya 2013; 15(3): 192–197.
5. Wood T.K., Knabel S.J., Kwan B.W. Bacterial persister cell formation and dormancy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79(23): 7116–7121, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02636-13.
6. Jõers A., Kaldalu N., Tenson T. The frequency of persisters in Escherichia coli reflects the kinetics of awakening from dormancy. J Bacteriol 2010; 192(13): 3379–3384, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00056-10.
7. Kaldalu N., Jõers A., Ingelman H., Tenson T. A general method for measuring persister levels in Escherichia coli cultures. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1333: 29–42, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_3.
8. Fisher R.A., Gollan B., Helaine S. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017; 15(8): 453–464, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42.
9. Helaine S., Kugelberg E. Bacterial persisters: formation, eradication, and experimental systems. Trends Microbiol 2014; 22(7): 417–424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.03.008.
10. Prax M., Bertram R. Metabolic aspects of bacterial persisters. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2014; 4: 148, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00148.
11. Amato S.M., Fazen C.H., Henry T.C., Mok W.W., Orman M.A., Sandvik E.L., Volzing K.G., Brynildsen M.P. The role of metabolism in bacterial persistence. Front Microbiol 2014; 5: 70, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00070.
12. Molina-Quiroz R.C., Lazinski D.W., Camilli A., Levy S.B. Transposon-sequencing analysis unveils novel genes involved in the generation of persister cells in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60(11): 6907–6910, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01617-16.
13. Orman M.A., Brynildsen M.P. Establishment of a method to rapidly assay bacterial persister metabolism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57(9): 4398–4409, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00372-13.
14. Fisher R.A., Cheverton A.M., Helaine S. Analysis of macrophage-induced salmonella persisters. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1333: 177–178, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_15.
15. Grassi L., Di Luca M., Maisetta G., Rinaldi A.C., Esin S., Trampuz A., Batoni G. Generation of persister cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus by chemical treatment and evaluation of their susceptibility to membrane-targeting agents. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 1917, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01917.
16. Mayansky A.N., Mayansky D.N. Ocherki o neytrofile i makrofage [Essays on neutrophil and macrophage]. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1989; 344 p.
17. Santos A.S., Finlay B.B. Bringing down the host: enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector-mediated subversion of host innate immune pathways. Cell Microbiol 2015; 17(3): 318–332, https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12412.

Mayansky N.A., Bocharova Yu.A., Brzhozovskaya E.A., Lazareva A.V., Chebotar I.V. Reactivity of Neutrophil-Like HL-60 Cells towards Persistent Forms of Escherichia coli. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2019; 11(4): 82, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2019.11.4.09