Development of a 3D Tumor Spheroid Model from the Patient’s Glioblastoma Cells and Its Study by Metabolic Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging

Patient-specific in vitro tumor models are a promising platform for studying the mechanisms of oncogenesis and personalized selection of drugs. In case of glial brain tumors, development and use of such models is particularly relevant as the effectiveness of such tumor treatment remains extremely unsatisfactory.

The aim of the study was to develop a model of a 3D tumor glioblastoma spheroid based on a patient’s surgical material and to study its metabolic characteristics by means of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy of metabolic coenzymes.

Materials and Methods. The study was conducted with tumor samples from patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (Grade IV). To create spheroids, primary cultures were isolated from tumor tissue samples; the said cultures were characterized morphologically and immunocytochemically, and then planted into round-bottom ultra low-adhesion plates. The number of cells for planting was chosen empirically. The characteristics of the growth of cell cultures were compared with spheroids from glioblastomas of patients with U373 MG stable line of human glioblastoma. Visualization of autofluorescence of metabolic coenzymes of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) NAD(P)H and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) in spheroids was performed by means of an LSM 880 laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with a FLIM module (Becker & Hickl GmbH, Germany). The autofluorescence decay parameters were studied under normoxic and hypoxic conditions (3.5% О₂).

Results. An original protocol for 3D glioblastoma spheroids cultivation was developed. Primary glial cultures from surgical material of patients were obtained and characterized. The isolated glioblastoma cells had a spindle-shaped morphology with numerous processes and a pronounced granularity of cytoplasm. All cultures expressed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). The optimal seeding dose of 2000 cells per well was specified; its application results in formation of spheroids with a dense structure and stable growth during 7 days. The FLIM method helped to establish that spheroid cells from the patient material had a generally similar metabolism to spheroids from the stable line, however, they demonstrated more pronounced metabolic heterogeneity. Cultivation of spheroids under hypoxic conditions revealed a transition to a more glycolytic type of metabolism, which is expressed in an increase in the contribution of the free form of NAD(P)H to fluorescence decay.

Conclusion. The developed model of tumor spheroids from patients’ glioblastomas in combination with the FLIM can serve as a tool to study characteristics of tumor metabolism and develop predictive tests to evaluate the effectiveness of antitumor therapy.

1. Oronsky B., Reid T.R., Oronsky A., Sandhu N., Knox S.J. A review of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 574012, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.574012.
2. Zhang C., Jin M., Zhao J., Chen J., Jin W. Organoid models of glioblastoma: advances, applications and challenges. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10(8): 2242–2257.
3. da Hora C.C., Schweiger M.W., Wurdinger T., Tannous B.A. Patient-derived glioma models: from patients to dish to animals. Cells 2019; 8(10): 1177, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101177.
4. Rybin M.J., Ivan M.E., Ayad N.G., Zeier Z. Organoid models of glioblastoma and their role in drug discovery. Front Cell Neurosci 2021; 15: 605255, https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.605255.
5. Paolillo M., Comincini S., Schinelli S. In vitro glioblastoma models: a journey into the third dimension. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13(10): 2449, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102449.
6. Haddad A.F., Young J.S., Amara D., Berger M.S., Raleigh D.R., Aghi M.K., Butowski N.A. Mouse models of glioblastoma for the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3(1): vdab100, https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab100.
7. Browning A.P., Sharp J.A., Murphy R.J., Gunasingh G., Lawson B., Burrage K., Haass N.K., Simpson M. Quantitative analysis of tumour spheroid structure. Elife 2021; 10: e73020, https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.73020.
8. Han S.J., Kwon S., Kim K.S. Challenges of applying multicellular tumor spheroids in preclinical phase. Cancer Cell Int 2021; 21(1): 152, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01853-8.
9. Yuzhakova D.V., Shirmanova M.V., Klimenko V.V., Lukina M.M., Gavrina A.I., Komarova A.D., Gorbachev D.A., Sapogova N.V., Lukyanov K.A., Kamensky V.A. PDT with genetically encoded photosensitizer miniSOG on a tumor spheroid model: a comparative study of continuous-wave and pulsed irradiation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2021; 1865(12): 129978, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129978.
10. Perche F., Torchilin V.P. Cancer cell spheroids as a model to evaluate chemotherapy protocols. Cancer Biol Ther 2012; 13(12): 1205–1213, https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.21353.
11. Zhu Y., Kang E., Wilson M., Basso T., Chen E., Yu Y., Li Y.R. 3D tumor spheroid and organoid to model tumor microenvironment for cancer immunotherapy. Organoids 2022; 1(2): 149–167, https://doi.org/10.3390/organoids1020012.
12. Hofmann S., Cohen-Harazi R., Maizels Y., Koman I. Patient-derived tumor spheroid cultures as a promising tool to assist personalized therapeutic decisions in breast cancer. Transl Cancer Res 2022; 11(1): 134–147, https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1577.
13. Morelli M., Lessi F., Barachini S., Liotti R., Montemurro N., Perrini P., Santonocito O.S., Gambacciani C., Snuderl M., Pieri F., Aquila F., Farnesi A., Naccarato A.G., Viacava P., Cardarelli F., Ferri G., Mulholland P., Ottaviani D., Paiar F., Liberti G., Pasqualetti F., Menicagli M., Aretini P., Signore G., Franceschi S., Mazzanti C.M. Metabolic-imaging of human glioblastoma live tumors: a new precision-medicine approach to predict tumor treatment response early. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 969812, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.969812.
14. Martínez-Reyes I., Chandel N.S. Cancer metabolism: looking forward. Nat Rev Cancer 2021; 21(10): 669–680, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-021-00378-6.
15. Läsche M., Emons G., Gründker C. Shedding new light on cancer metabolism: a metabolic tightrope between life and death. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 409, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00409.
16. Chae H.S., Hong S.T. Overview of cancer metabolism and signaling transduction. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 24(1): 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010012.
17. Tong Y., Gao W.Q., Liu Y. Metabolic heterogeneity in cancer: an overview and therapeutic implications. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2020; 1874(2): 188421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188421.
18. Kim J., DeBerardinis R.J. Mechanisms and implications of metabolic heterogeneity in cancer. Cell Metab 2019; 30(3): 434–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.013.
19. Kolenc O.I., Quinn K.P. Evaluating cell metabolism through autofluorescence imaging of NAD(P)H and FAD. Antioxid Redox Signal 2019; 30(6): 875–889, https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7451.
20. Shirshin E.A., Shirmanova M.V., Gayer A.V., Lukina M.M., Nikonova E.E., Yakimov B.P., Budylin G.S., Dudenkova V.V., Ignatova N.I., Komarov D.V., Yakovlev V.V., Becker W., Zagaynova E.V., Shcheslavskiy V.I., Scully M.O. Label-free sensing of cells with fluorescence lifetime imaging: the quest for metabolic heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119(9): e2118241119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118241119.
21. Ouyang Y., Liu Y., Wang Z.M., Liu Z., Wu M. FLIM as a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Nanomicro Lett 2021; 13(1): 133, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00653-z.
22. Blacker T.S., Mann Z.F., Gale J.E., Ziegler M., Bain A.J., Szabadkai G., Duchen M.R. Separating NADH and NADPH fluorescence in live cells and tissues using FLIM. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3936, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4936.
23. Skala M.C., Riching K.M., Bird D.K., Gendron-Fitzpatrick A., Eickhoff J., Eliceiri K.W., Keely P.J., Ramanujam N. In vivo multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging of protein-bound and free nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in normal and precancerous epithelia. J Biomed Opt 2007; 12(2): 024014, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2717503.
24. Alam S.R., Wallrabe H., Svindrych Z., Chaudhary A.K., Christopher K.G., Chandra D., Periasamy A. Investigation of mitochondrial metabolic response to doxorubicin in prostate cancer cells: an NADH, FAD and tryptophan FLIM assay. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 10451, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10856-3.
25. Boucherit N., Gorvel L., Olive D. 3D tumor models and their use for the testing of immunotherapies. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 603640, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.603640.
26. Hirschhaeuser F., Menne H., Dittfeld C., West J., Mueller-Klieser W., Kunz-Schughart L.A. Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. J Biotechnol 2010; 148(1): 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.012.
27. Abdolahi S., Ghazvinian Z., Muhammadnejad S., Saleh M., Asadzadeh Aghdaei H., Baghaei K. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, applications and challenges in cancer research. J Transl Med 2022; 20(1): 206, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03405-8.
28. Yoshida G.J. Applications of patient-derived tumor xenograft models and tumor organoids. J Hematol Oncol 2020; 13(1): 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0829-z.
29. Chen C., Lin W., Huang Y., Chen X., Wang H., Teng L. The essential factors of establishing patient-derived tumor model. J Cancer 2021; 12(1): 28–37, https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.51749.
30. Aaberg-Jessen C., Nørregaard A., Christensen K., Pedersen C.B., Andersen C., Kristensen B.W. Invasion of primary glioma- and cell line-derived spheroids implanted into corticostriatal slice cultures. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013; 6(4): 546–560.
31. Witusik-Perkowska M., Rieske P., Hułas-Bigoszewska K., Zakrzewska M., Stawski R., Kulczycka-Wojdala D., Bieńkowski M., Stoczyńska-Fidelus E., Grešner S.M., Piaskowski S., Jaskólski D.J., Papierz W., Zakrzewski K., Kolasa M., Ironside J.W., Liberski P.P. Glioblastoma-derived spheroid cultures as an experimental model for analysis of EGFR anomalies. J Neurooncol 2011; 102(3): 395–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0352-0.
32. Stadler M., Scherzer M., Walter S., Holzner S., Pudelko K., Riedl A., Unger C., Kramer N., Weil B., Neesen J., Hengstschläger M., Dolznig H. Exclusion from spheroid formation identifies loss of essential cell-cell adhesion molecules in colon cancer cells. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 1151, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19384-0.
33. Lukina M.M., Dudenkova V.V., Ignatova N.I., Druzhkova I.N., Shimolina L.E., Zagaynova E.V., Shirmanova M.V. Metabolic cofactors NAD(P)H and FAD as potential indicators of cancer cell response to chemotherapy with paclitaxel. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018; 1862(8): 1693–1700, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.04.021.
34. Shirmanova M.V., Druzhkova I.N., Lukina M.M., Matlashov M.E., Belousov V.V., Snopova L.B., Prodanetz N.N., Dudenkova V.V., Lukyanov S.A., Zagaynova E.V. Intracellular pH imaging in cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo using the new genetically encoded sensor SypHer2. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1850(9): 1905–1911, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.05.001.
35. Pasch C.A., Favreau P.F., Yueh A.E., Babiarz C.P., Gillette A.A., Sharick J.T., Karim M.R., Nickel K.P., DeZeeuw A.K., Sprackling C.M., Emmerich P.B., DeStefanis R.A., Pitera R.T., Payne S.N., Korkos D.P., Clipson L., Walsh C.M., Miller D., Carchman E.H., Burkard M.E., Lemmon K.K., Matkowskyj K.A., Newton M.A., Ong I.M., Bassetti M.F., Kimple R.J., Skala M.C., Deming D.A. Patient-derived cancer organoid cultures to predict sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25(17): 5376–5387, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3590.
36. Sharick J.T., Walsh C.M., Sprackling C.M., Pasch C.A., Pham D.L., Esbona K., Choudhary A., Garcia-Valera R., Burkard M.E., McGregor S.M., Matkowskyj K.A., Parikh A.A., Meszoely I.M., Kelley M.C., Tsai S., Deming D.A., Skala M.C. Metabolic heterogeneity in patient tumor-derived organoids by primary site and drug treatment. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 553, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00553.
37. Park J.H., Lee H.K. Current understanding of hypoxia in glioblastoma multiforme and its response to immunotherapy. Cancers Basel 2022; 14(5): 1176, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051176.
38. Sebestyén A., Kopper L., Dankó T., Tímár J. Hypoxia signaling in cancer: from basics to clinical practice. Pathol Oncol Res 2021; 27: 1609802, https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1609802.
39. Shirmanova M.V., Druzhkova I.N., Lukina M.M., Dudenkova V.V., Ignatova N.I., Snopova L.B., Shcheslavskiy V.I., Belousov V.V., Zagaynova E.V. Chemotherapy with cisplatin: insights into intracellular pH and metabolic landscape of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 8911, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09426-4.

Yuzhakova D.V., Lukina M.M., Sachkova D.A., Yusubalieva G.M., Baklaushev V.P., Mozherov A.M., Dudenkova V.V., Gavrina A.I., Yashin K.S., Shirmanova M.V. Development of a 3D Tumor Spheroid Model from the Patient’s Glioblastoma Cells and Its Study by Metabolic Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2023; 15(2): 28, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2023.15.2.03