Today: Dec 27, 2024
RU / EN
Last update: Dec 27, 2024
Colon Microbiocenosis and Its Correction in Patients Receiving Programmed Hemodialysis

Colon Microbiocenosis and Its Correction in Patients Receiving Programmed Hemodialysis

Belova I.V., Khrulev A.E., Tochilina A.G., Khruleva N.S., Lobanova N.A., Zhirnov V.A., Molodtsova S.B., Lobanov V.N., Solovieva I.V.
Key words: microbiocenosis; colon microbiota; chronic kidney disease; programmed hemodialysis; probiotics; synbiotics.
2020, volume 12, issue 5, page 62.

Full text

html pdf
1511
1784

The aim of the investigation was to study the species composition of colon microbiocenosis in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving programmed hemodialysis treatment and to evaluate the efficacy of its correction using a new immobilized synbiotic.

Materials and Methods. Samples of colon microbiota from 62 patients undergoing programmed hemodialysis were studied before and after a course of diet therapy that included probiotic components, in particular, the immobilized synbiotic LB-complex L. Isolation of microorganisms was carried out according to our original method; for bacteria identification, a MALDI-TOF Autoflex speed mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik, Germany) was used in the Biotyper program mode. The results were assessed using the criteria proposed by the authors and based on the OST 91500.11.0004-2003. The efficacy of the immobilized synbiotic was determined based on the clinical data, questionnaires, and bacteriological tests.

Results. In patients receiving programmed hemodialysis (before the start of the diet therapy), chronic moderate inflammation and azotemia were found. Dysbiotic changes in microbiocenosis were revealed in all the examined patients; in the absence or suppression of lacto- and bifidoflora, the number and diversity of Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., Collinsella spp., Eggerthella spp. and other bacteria increased, which was consistent with the theory of functional redundancy of gut microbiota. From the answers to the questionnaires, a decrease in the quality of life was found (up to 70 points out of 100) according to six of the eight scales used. After the combined therapy using the synbiotic LB-complex L in the study group, 56% of the examined patients showed their microbiocenosis restored to normal; no grade III dysbiosis was detected in any patient. There was a significant decrease in CRP and ESR in these patients and an improvement in the quality of life by criteria reflecting physical health.

Conclusion. In patients receiving programmed hemodialysis, the addition of a probiotic component in the diet therapy restores the evolutionarily determined structure of the microbiocenosis, normalizes its functions, and leads to an overall improvement in health and quality of life.

  1. Liyanage T., Ninomiya T., Jha V., Neal B., Patrice H.M., Okpechi I., Zhao M.H., Lv J., Garg A.X., Knight J., Rodgers A., Gallagher M., Kotwal S., Cass A., Perkovic V. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet 2015; 385(9981): 1975–1982, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61601-9.
  2. Tomilina N.A., Andrusev A.M., Peregudova N.G., Shinkarev M.B. Renal replacement therapy for end stage renal disease in Russian Federation, 2010–2015. Russian National Renal Replacement Therapy Registry Report of Russian Public Organization of Nephrologists “Russian Dialysis Society”, part 1. Nefrologia i dializ 2017; 19(4, Suppl): 1–95, https://doi.org/10.28996/1680-4422-2017-4Suppl-1-95.
  3. Li F., Kam T., Garsiya-Garsiya G., Lui S.F., Andreoli Sh., Uinston V., Gradski A., Kumarasvami L., Liakopulos V., Rakhimova Z., Saadi G., Strani L., Ulasi I., Kalantar-Zade K. Kidney health for everyone everywhere — from prevention to detection and equitable access to care. Nefrologia i dializ 2020; 22(1): 10–23, https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2020-1-10-23.
  4. Nistor I., Palmer S.C., Craig J.C., Saglimbene V., Vecchio M., Covic A., Strippoli G.F.M. Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 5: CD006258, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006258.pub2.
  5. Vaziri N.D. Gut microbial translocation in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammation in patients with end-stage renal disease. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59(9): 2020–2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3287-z.
  6. Al Khodor S., Shatat I.F. Gut microbiome and kidney disease: a bidirectional relationship. Pediatr Nеphrol 2017; 32(6): 921–931, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3392-7.
  7. Barilko M., Seliverstov P., Radchenko V. Colon dysbiosis and chronic kidney disease. Vrach 2019; 30(2): 14–19, https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2019-02-02.
  8. Aytbaev K.A., Murkamilov I.T., Kaliev R.R. Chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological role of dysbiosis of intestine and renoprotective effectiveness of interventions concerning its modulation. Rossiiskii meditsinskii zhurnal 2016; 22(3): 157–162.
  9. Strokov G.A., Gurevich K.Y., Ilyin A.P., Denisov A.Yu., Zemchenkov A.Yu., Andrusov A.M., Shutov E.V., Kotenko O.N., Zlokazov V.B. Treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD 5) by hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. Clinical guidelines. Nefrologiya 2017; 21(3): 92–111, https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2017-3-92-111.
  10. Standarty lechebnogo pitaniya: metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Clinical nutrition standards: methodological guide]. Moscow: MZ RF; 2017; 313 p.
  11. Anders H.J., Andersen K., Stecher B. The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease. Kidney Int 2013; 83(6): 1010–1016, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.440.
  12. Ramezani A., Massy Z.A., Meijers B., Evenepoel P., Vanholder R., Raj D.S. Role of the gut microbiome in uremia: a potential therapeutic target. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(3): 48–498, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.027.
  13. Andrusev A.M., Bevzenko A.Yu., Vishnevskiy K.A., Gerasimchuk R.P., Zemchenkov A.Yu., Nazarov A.V., Ryasnyanskiy V.Yu., Selyutin A.A., Shilo V.Yu., Shutov E.V., Yampol’skiy A.F. Recommendations of the Russian Dialysis Society for assessing the quality of medical care in preparation for the initiation of renal replacement therapy and dialysis treatment for adult patients with stage V CKD. Nefrologia i dializ 2015; 17(1): 10–19.
  14. Khrulev A.E., Kudryavtseva E.S., Egorova P.A., Rodionova A.D., Sorokoumova S.N., Suvorova O.V. Quality of life of long-term hemodialysis patients. Obshchaa reanimatologia 2019; 15(2): 4–12, https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2019-2-4-12.
  15. Tochilina A.G., Belova I.V., Solov’eva I.V., Zhirnov V.A., Ivanova T.P. Criteria for evaluating the composition of the colon lumen biocenosis. Spravochnik zaveduyushchego KDL 2016; 8: 54–78.
  16. Otraslevoy standart OST 91500.11.0004-2003. Protokol vedeniya bol’nykh. Disbakterioz kishechnika: Prikaz MZ RF No.231 [Industry standard OST 91500.11.0004-2003. Patient management protocol. Intestinal dysbiosis: Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No.231]. Moscow; 2003; 112 p.
  17. Belova I.V., Tochilina A.G., Soloveva I.V., Zhilenkova O.G., Melikhova A.V., Belyaeva E.V., Ermolina G.B., Boriskina E.V., Zhirnov V.A., Ivanova T.P. The results of “LB-complex L” immobilized synbiotic safety study in animals. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy 2018; 2: 85–89.
  18. Safety demonstration of microbial food cultures (MFC) in fermented food products. Bulletin of the Inetrnational Dairy Federation 455/2012. URL: http://www.ukidf.org/documents/Bulletin455.pdf.
  19. Gigienicheskie trebovaniya bezopasnosti i pishchevoy tsennosti pishchevykh produktov. Dop. i izm. 5 k SanPin 2.3.2.1078-01: SanPiN 2.3.2.2227-07; dop. i izm. 6 k SanPiN 2.3.2.1078-01: SanPiN 2.3.2.2340-08 [Hygienic requirements for food safety and nutritional value. Add. and rev. 5 to SanPiN 2.3.2.1078-01: SanPi N 2.3.2.2227-07; add. and rev. 6 to SanPiN 2.3.2.1078-01: SanPiN 2.3.2.2340-08]. Moscow: Federal’nyy tsentr gigieny i epidemiologii Rospotrebnadzora; 2008.
  20. Solov’eva I.V., Tochilina A.G., Belova I.V., Efimov E.I., Novikova N.A., Ivanova T.P. Construction of an immobilized form of the liquid probiotic. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo 2012; 2(3): 85–92.
  21. Sitkin S.I., Tkachenko E.I., Vakhitov T.Ya. Metabolic dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and its biomarkers. Eksperimental’naa i klinicheskaa gastroenterologia 2015; 12: 6–29.
  22. Mahowald M.A., Rey F.E., Seedorf H., Turnbaugh P.J., Fulton R.S., Wollam A., Shah N., Wang C., Magrini V., Wilson R.K., Cantarel B.L., Coutinho P.M., Henrissat B., Crock L.W., Russell A., Verberkmoes N.C., Hettich R.L., Gordon J.I. Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(14): 5859–5864, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901529106.
Belova I.V., Khrulev A.E., Tochilina A.G., Khruleva N.S., Lobanova N.A., Zhirnov V.A., Molodtsova S.B., Lobanov V.N., Solovieva I.V. Colon Microbiocenosis and Its Correction in Patients Receiving Programmed Hemodialysis. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2020; 12(5): 62, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2020.12.5.07


Journal in Databases

pubmed_logo.jpg

web_of_science.jpg

scopus.jpg

crossref.jpg

ebsco.jpg

embase.jpg

ulrich.jpg

cyberleninka.jpg

e-library.jpg

lan.jpg

ajd.jpg

SCImago Journal & Country Rank