Ab ovo: Factors Affecting the Radial Stiffness of Thoracic Aorta Stent-Grafts

The aim of the investigation was to study the factors influencing the radial stiffness of the thoracic aorta stent-grafts with the stent elements made of nitinol tubes by laser cutting and thermal shape setting.

Materials and Methods. The work used stent elements made by different technologies by two different manufacturers from a nitinol tube with a wall thickness of 0.5 mm (E1) and 0.4 mm (E2), with a final diameter of 20 mm. Height of cells E1 — 15 mm, E2 — 12.5 mm. The stents were manually attached to a tubular woven non-crimped base (PTGO Sever, Russia) with a 6/0 suture, resulting in either single or continuous stitches. In the RLU124 radial force tester (Blockwise Engineering LLC, USA), each of the four stent-grafts, as well as their individual stent elements, were compressed by 10 mm from the initial diameter. The dependence of the radial forces on deformation under loading and unloading was graphically presented. The temperature and enthalpy of phase transitions of nitinols into the austenite (Af) and martensitic (Mf) phases were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-3; Mettler Toledo, USA). All indicators were compared with the characteristics of two commercial models — Cronus (China) and E-vita Open Plus (Germany).

Results. Four prototypes of SibHybrid stent-grafts were tested; those differed in their stent elements, distances between them, and the type of sutures (single or continuous). The stent elements of the models studied differed in the values of Af, Mf, and the enthalpy of phase transitions of nitinols. The hardest stent was the E2 prototype. The fixation of stent elements to the woven fabric in the graft increased the radial force by 4.0–5.5 times. During compression by 50 and 20% of the original diameter, the SibHybrid models developed radial force 4.5–6.0 times greater compared with the E-vita Оpen Plus model. The radial force values of SibHybrid models were almost the same as for the Cronus and models at 20% compression. Using continuous twining round suturing increased the radial force by about 10 N; accordingly, SibHybrid E2 had the highest radial force because it was fixed by a continuous suture. The density of the stent elements fixed on the fabric did not affect the radial force of the stent-graft as a whole.

Conclusion. In the manufacture of stent elements from nitinol tubes, the main factor determining the radial stiffness is the technology of nitinol shape setting. With the standard technology of thermal shape setting, radial force can be changed by varying the height of the structure cell element and the cross-sectional area of the cell bars, as well as the suturing technique.

1. Karck M., Chavan A., Hagl C., Friedrich H., Galanski M., Haverich A. The frozen elephant trunk technique: a new treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125(6): 1550–1553, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00045-x.
2. Di Bartolomeo R., Murana G., Di Marco L., Alfonsi J., Gliozzi G., Amodio C., Leone A., Pacini D. Is the frozen elephant trunk frozen? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67(1): 111–117, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0911-4.
3. Santos I.C., Rodrigues A., Figueiredo L., Rocha L.A., Tavares J.M.R.S. Mechanical properties of stent–graft materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng L 2012; 226(4): 330–341, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420712451065.
4. Canaud L., Gandet T., Sfeir J., Ozdemir B.A., Solovei L., Alric P. Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry tear after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69(5): 1610–1614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.086.
5. Kreibich M., Bünte D., Berger T., Vötsch A., Rylski B., Krombholz-Reindl P., Chen Z., Morlock J., Beyersdorf F., Winkler A., Rolauffs B., Siepe M., Gottardi R., Czerny M. Distal stent-graft-induced new entries following the frozen elephant trunk procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110(4): 1271–1279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.017.
6. Berger T., Weiss G., Voetsch A., Arnold Z., Kreibich M., Rylski B., Krombholz-Reindl P., Winkler A., Mach M., Geisler D., Seitelberger R., Siepe M., Beyersdorf F., Grabenwoeger M., Czerny M., Gottardi R. Multicentre experience with two frozen elephant trunk prostheses in the treatment of acute aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56(3): 572–578, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz037.
7. Haulon S., Kratzberg J.A., Wilger K.D. Branched frozen elephant trunk device and method. Patent US 2019/0365523 A1. 2019.
8. Wilger K.D., Kratzberg J.A. Branched frozen elephant trunk device and method. Patent US 2019/0365524 A1. 2019.
9. Palermo T.J., Lee P.H., Jen J. Vascular and aortic grafts and deployment tool. Patent US 2020/0008927 A1; 2020.
10. Jang H., Kim M.D., Kim G.M., Won J.Y., Ko Y.G., Choi D., Joo H.C., Lee D.Y. Risk factors for stent graft-induced new entry after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65(3): 676–685, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.022.
11. Pierce D.M., Maier F., Weisbecker H., Viertler C., Verbrugghe P., Famaey N., Fourneau I., Herijgers P., Holzapfel G.A. Human thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysmal tissues: damage experiments, statistical analysis and constitutive modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 41: 92–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.10.003.
12. Cebull H.L., Rayz V.L., Goergen C.J. Recent advances in biomechanical characterization of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7: 75, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00075.
13. Davis F.M., Luo Yu., Avril S., Duprey A., Lu J. Local mechanical properties of human ascending thoracic aneurysms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 61: 235–249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.025.
14. Azadani A.N., Chitsaz S., Mannion A., Mookhoek A., Wisneski A., Guccione J.M., Hope M.D., Ge L., Tseng E.E. Biomechanical properties of human ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96(1): 50–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.094.
15. Sherifova S., Holzapfel G.A. Biomechanics of aortic wall failure with a focus on dissection and aneurysm: a review. Acta Biomater 2019; 99: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.017.
16. Di Martino E.S., Bohra A., Vande Geest J.P., Gupta N., Makaroun M.S., Vorp D.A. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43(3): 570–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.072.
17. Amabili M., Arena G.O., Balasubramanian P., Breslavsky I.D., Cartier R., Ferrari G., Holzapfel G.A., Kassab A., Mongrain R. Biomechanical characterization of a chronic type a dissected human aorta. J Biomech 2020; 110: 109978, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109978.
18. Shanmugam K., Viswanatha N., Ramanathan R.K., Rajan J., Selvam S., Thanikachalam M. Design optimization of thoracic endovascular stent graft (EVSG). In: Goh J. (editor). The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, IFMBE Proceedings 43. Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2014; p. 352–355, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_90.
19. Kleinstreuer C., Li Z., Basciano C.A., Seelecke S., Farber M.A. Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. J Biomech 2008; 41(11): 2370–2378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.032.
20. Senf B., von Sachsen S., Neugebauer R., Drossel W.G., Florek H.J., Mohr F.W., Etz C.D. The effect of stent graft oversizing on radial forces considering nitinol wire behavior and vessel characteristics. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36(11): 1480–1486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.020.

Zhuravleva I.Yu., Timchenko T.P., Vladimirov S.V., Lyashenko M.M., Kuznetsova E.V., Chernyavskiy A.M. Ab ovo: Factors Affecting the Radial Stiffness of Thoracic Aorta Stent-Grafts. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2021; 13(1): 17, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.1.02