Choosing the Optimal Rat Stock as a Model for Research into Pharmacological Correction of Male Sexual Dysfunction

The aim of the study is to identify the mechanisms mediating differences in sexual behavior between Sprague Dawley and Wistar rats, in order to choose the optimal stock for research into pharmacological correction of male sexual dysfunction.

Materials and Methods. The experiments were carried out on sexually mature male rats of two stocks (Sprague Dawley and Wistar) weighing 350–450 g and aged 3 to 6 months. The comparative study of animal behavior was performed using standard tests for social interaction, locomotor activity, and anxiety level, as well as male mating behavior patterns. In order to determine the role of hypothalamic glycine receptors in the male sexual behavior, pharmacological manipulations of glycine receptor activity during mating with receptive females were conducted via bilateral intracerebral microcannulas implanted in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) of the male rat anterior hypothalamus.

Results. The obtained results revealed statistically significant inter-stock differences in sexual behavior at the final consummatory stage of both intact animals and those after pharmacological activation of glycine receptors in the mPOA. The number of anxiety-related grooming patterns in the Open Field test significantly differed between the stocks for both intact animals and those after pharmacological activation of glycine receptors; the observed differences disappeared after the mPOA glycine receptors were blocked. In the Crowley test of social interaction, no significant difference was found between the stocks.

Thus, the revealed difference in sexual behavior between Sprague Dawley and Wistar male rats is likely due to the difference in the level of anxiety, which, in turn, may be associated with difference in the mechanisms of glycinergic neurotransmission in the hypothalamic mPOAs of these rats.

Conclusion. To study the relationship between the level of anxiety and sexual behavior, the choice of the Wistar rat stock is optimal since the male sexual behavior in this stock is more sensitive to stress than that in Sprague Dawley rats. However, to model male sexual dysfunction not associated with anxiety, the use of Sprague Dawley male rats should be preferred as these animals show more stable sexual behavior, which is less dependent on the level of anxiety.

1. Mehta N., Sikka S., Rajasekaran M. Rat as an animal model for male erectile function evaluation in sexual medicine research. J Sex Med 2008; 5(6): 1278–1283, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00854.x.
2. Skayneh H., Jishi B., Hleihel R., Hamieh M., Darwiche N., Bazarbachi A., El Sabban M., El Hajj H. A critical review of animal models used in acute myeloid leukemia pathophysiology. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10(8): 614, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10080614.
3. Manns M., Basbasse Y.E., Freund N., Ocklenburg S. Paw preferences in mice and rats: meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 127: 593–606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.011.
4. McLean J.H., Dupeire W.A., Elder S.T. Strain differences in the mating behavior of Sprague-Dawley, Long-Evans, and Wistar male rats. Psychon Sci 1972; 175–176, https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03342585.
5. Emery D.E., Larsson K. Rat strain differences in copulatory behavior after para-chlorophenylalanine and hormone treatment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1979; 93(6): 1067–1084, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077640.
6. Zhuravleva Z.D., Lebedeva A.V., Volnova A.B., Mukhina I.V., Druzin M.Ya. The effect of glycine microinjections in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus on the sexual behavior of male rats. Neurochem J 2015; 9: 141–145, https://doi.org/10.1134/s1819712415020117.
7. Zhuravleva Z.D., Mogutina M.A., Mukhina I.V., Druzin M.Ya. Effects of glycine receptors of the medial preoptic nucleus on sexual behavior of male Wistar rats. Bull Exp Biol Med 2020; 169(3): 299–301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-020-04873-y.
8. Zhao C., Chang L., Auger A.P., Gammie S.C., Riters L.V. Mu opioid receptors in the medial preoptic area govern social play behavior in adolescent male rats. Genes Brain Behav 2020; 19(7): e12662, https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12662.
9. León Rodríguez D.A., Dueñas Z. Maternal separation during breastfeeding induces gender-dependent changes in anxiety and the GABA-A receptor alpha-subunit in adult Wistar rats. PLoS One 2013; 8(6): e68010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068010.
10. Hull E.M., Dominguez J.M. Neuroendocrine regulation of male sexual behavior. Compr Physiol 2019; 9(4): 1383–1410, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c180018.
11. Viau V. Functional cross-talk between the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and -adrenal axes. J Neuroendocrinol 2002; 14(6): 506–513, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2826.2002.00798.x.
12. Karlsson U., Druzin M., Johansson S. Cl– concentration changes and desensitization of GABAA and glycine receptors. J Gen Physiol 2011; 138(6): 609–626, https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201110674.
13. Schaefer N., Roemer V., Janzen D., Villmann C. Impaired glycine receptor trafficking in neurological diseases. Front Mol Neurosci 2018; 11: 291, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00291.
14. Ågmo A. Male rat sexual behavior. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 1997; 1(2): 203–209, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1385-299x(96)00036-0.
15. Heijkoop R., Huijgens P.T., Snoeren E.M.S. Assessment of sexual behavior in rats: the potentials and pitfalls. Behav Brain Res 2018; 352: 70–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.029.
16. Kaidanovich-Beilin O., Lipina T., Vukobradovic I., Roder J., Woodgett J.R. Assessment of social interaction behaviors. J Vis Exp 2011; 48: 2473, https://doi.org/10.3791/2473.
17. Kalueff A.V., Stewart A.M., Song C., Berridge K.C., Graybiel A.M., Fentress J.C. Neurobiology of rodent self-grooming and its value for translational neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17(1): 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.8.
18. Veening J.G., Coolen L.M. Neural mechanisms of sexual behavior in the male rat: emphasis on ejaculation-related circuits. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014; 121: 170–183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.12.017.
19. Umryukhin P.E., Grigorchuk O.S. Behavior of rats in an open field test as a prognostic indicator of corticosterone levels before and after stress. Neurosci Behav Physi 2017; 47: 456–458, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0421-3.
20. Kumar A., Basak S., Rao S., Gicheru Y., Mayer M.L., Sansom M.S.P., Chakrapani S. Mechanisms of activation and desensitization of full-length glycine receptor in lipid nanodiscs. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 3752, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17364-5.
21. Yu A., Lau A.Y. Glutamate and glycine binding to the NMDA receptor. Structure 2018; 26(7): 1035–1043.e2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2018.05.004.

Zhuravleva Z.D., Titova N.A., Mukhina I.V., Druzin M.Ya. Choosing the Optimal Rat Stock as a Model for Research into Pharmacological Correction of Male Sexual Dysfunction. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2021; 13(6): 36, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.6.04