Use of Additive Technologies in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Posterior Dislocations of the Shoulder

Pavlov D.V., Korolev S.B., Kopylov A.Yu., Zykin A.A., Gorbatov R.O., Illarionova T.V., Gorin V.V., Alyev R.V.

Key words: posterior dislocation of the humerus head; osteochondral injury of the humerus head; reverse Hill–Sachs lesion; shoulder joint replacement arthroplasty; 3D printing; additive technologies; McLaughlin procedure.

2022, volume 14, issue 3, page 50.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.3.06

Full text

html pdf

1722

1105

Abstract
References
How to cite

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of additive technologies in surgical treatment of patients with osteochondral defects of the humeral head articular surface against the background of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder by means of comparing clinical and radiological results with the McLaughlin procedure.

Materials and Methods. A prospective randomized comparative group clinical study was conducted, which included 20 patients who in 2019–2021 underwent surgical treatment of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder in the Traumatological and Orthopedic Department of the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Privolzhsky Research Medical University (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia). Depending on the type of surgery, all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=10) was subject to McLaughlin procedure, whereas group 2 (n=10) — to reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant based on additive technologies (3D printing). To assess postoperative results, 6 months after the surgery all patients underwent the following procedures: X-ray imaging of the shoulder joint in two projections, CT scanning, and angulometry as well as provided their responses in line with the following questionnaires: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), and the Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey (Survey of Patient, SP).

Results. Both the McLaughlin procedure and the reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant made using additive 3D printing technologies increased the range of motion in the shoulder joint, mitigated the pain syndrome and improved the patients’ quality of life. During the postoperative period, there were no infectious complications in both groups. The total bed-day in group 1 was 7 [5; 9] days; in group 2, it was 8 [6; 9] days. There was no recurrence of dislocation or progression of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in patients in both groups during 6 months after the surgery. The ASES, SP, SRQ, CSS, DASH, and VAS questionnaires assessment for both groups showed a statistically significant improvement for all indicators in the postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups as to the results of angulometry and answering the questionnaires.

Conclusion. Customized implants made using additive technologies can shorten the surgery duration by 1.3 times, whereas the volume of intraoperative blood loss — by at least 1.5 times compared to the McLaughlin procedure.

Coyner K.J., Arciero R.A. Shoulder instability: anterior, posterior, multidirectional, arthroscopic versus open, bone block procedures. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2018; 26(4): 168–170, https://doi.org/10.1097/jsa.0000000000000211.
Tolstykh A.L., Mokhamad A. Analysis of the options of the damaged structures of the shoulder joint, accompanying traumatic shoulder dislocation. Vestnik eksperimentalʹnoj i kliniceskoj hirurgii 2013; 6(3): 353–359.
Ageyev A.A., Ignatjev A.G., Tutunnikov A.V. Surgical tactic of treatment of inveterate dislocation of shoulder. Bulleten’ Sibirskogo otdelenia Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk 2006; 4: 20–24.
López-Muñoz R. Posterior instability of the shoulder. Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33(5): 337–345.
Itoi E. ‘On-track’ and ‘off-track’ shoulder lesions. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 2(8): 343–351, https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.170007.
Brelin A., Dickens J.F. Posterior shoulder instability. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2017; 25(3): 136–143, https://doi.org/10.1097/jsa.0000000000000160.
Belyak E.A., Prizov A.P., Lazko M.F., Grigor’ev I.V., Zagorodniy N.V., Lazko F.L. Experience in use of modified McLaughlin procedure for neglected locked posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova 2017; 24(3): 46–50, https://doi.org/10.17816/vto201724346-50.
Hawi N., Bruns N., Razaeian S., Clausen J.D., Krettek C. 3D-Druck im Bereich der Schulterchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 2022; 125: 371–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-022-01174-z.
Citak M., Kochsiek L., Gehrke T., Haasper C., Suero E.M., Mau H. Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. Hip International 2018; 28(3): 266–271, https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000561.
Sereda A.P., Andrianova M.A. Study design guidelines. Travmatologia i ortopedia Rossii 2019; 25(3): 165–184, https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-3-165-184.
Gevorgyan A., Abrahamyan D.O., Yaghjyan G.V. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Eastern Armenian and Russian versions of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand outcome measure. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31(9):1550–1551, https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0b013e32830435b8.
Michener L.A., McClure P.W., Sennett B.J. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11(6): 587–594, https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.127096.
Roe Y., Soberg H.L., Bautz-Holter E., Ostensjo S. A systematic review of measures of shoulder pain and functioning using the International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 28: 73, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-73.
L‘Insalata J.C., Warren R.F., Cohen S.B., Altchek D.W., Peterson M.G. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(5): 738–748.
Mancuso C.A., Altchek D.W., Craig E.V., Jones E.C., Robbins L., Warren R.F., Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11(6): 541–549, https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.126764.
Hu H., Liu W., Zeng Q., Wang S., Zhang Z., Liu J., Zhang Y., Shao Z., Wang B. The personalized shoulder reconstruction assisted by 3D printing technology after resection of the proximal humerus tumours. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11: 10665–10673, https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s232051.
Besnard M., Audebert S., Godenèche A. Arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure for treatment of posterior instability of the shoulder with an engaging reverse Hill–Sachs lesion. Arthrosc Tech 2019; 8(12): 1491–1494, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2019.07.025.

Pavlov D.V., Korolev S.B., Kopylov A.Yu., Zykin A.A., Gorbatov R.O., Illarionova T.V., Gorin V.V., Alyev R.V. Use of Additive Technologies in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Posterior Dislocations of the Shoulder. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2022; 14(3): 50, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.3.06