Today: Nov 23, 2024
RU / EN
Last update: Oct 30, 2024
The Use of Selective Photothermolysis with Sclerosing  to Treat Congenital and Neonatal Vascular Maxillofacial Hyperplasia  in Children

The Use of Selective Photothermolysis with Sclerosing to Treat Congenital and Neonatal Vascular Maxillofacial Hyperplasia in Children

Ryzhevskiy D.V., Trubin V.V., Durnovo Е.А.
Key words: hemangioma; fraction photothermolysis; vascular skin hyperplasia.
2014, volume 6, issue 4, page 145.

Full text

html pdf
4222
1532

The aim of the investigation was to assess the treatment efficacy of maxillofacial infantile hemangiomas by a single-stage use of selective photothermolysis and sclerosing compared to the isolated use of selective photothermolysis and conventional cryodestruction.

Materials and Methods. 250 clinical cases were studied. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 — with cryodestruction (n=79), group 2 — selective photothermolysis (n=87), group 3 — combined treatment of selective photothermolysis and sclerosing (n=84). For the avoidance of doubt, we selected only similar clinical cases, the main selection parameter being he height and(or) depth of vascular hyperplasia invasion in intact tissues (from 5 to 9 mm), the involvement area being of secondary importance. The treatment efficacy criteria were the following: 1) reduction of the involvement area (cosmetic result) in the course of the first procedure; 2) the number of follow-ups of a growing tumor in a group per year; 3) reduction of treatment duration.

Results. Mean treatment time in combination of selective photothermolysis and sclerosing reduced by 60% compared to cryodestruction, and by 37% — compared to monotherapy (selective photothermolysis). Positive cosmetic result after the first treatment procedure exceeded that of monotherapies: cryodestruction — by 25.61%, and selective photothermolysis — by 14.77%. There was observed the reduced number of repeated procedures necessary for maximum tumor regress.

Conclusion. A combined technique of selective photothermolysis and sclerosing enables to improve the treatment efficacy of pediatric hemangiomas, improve functional and esthetic results, and reduce the time required for the management of children with this pathology.

  1. Detskaya khirurgiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo [Pediatric surgery: national guidelines]. Pod red. Isakova Yu.F., Dronova A.F. [Isakov Yu.F., Dronov A.F. (editors)]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009; 1053 p.
  2. Bruckner A.L., Frieden I.J. Hemangiomas of infancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48(4)4: 477–493.
  3. Wendling P. Hemangioma risk tied to birth weight. Skin & Allergy News 2008; 39(9), http://skin.gcnpublishing.com/fileadmin/content_pdf/archive_pdf/vol39iss9/70640_main.pdf.
  4. Enjolras O., Soupre V., Picard A. Classification of superficial vascular anomalies. Presse Med 2010; 39(4): 457–464, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2009.07.029.
  5. Arkharov A.M., Solenov V.I., Vozdvizhenskiy I.S., Tsyganov D.I., Butorina A.B., Shafranov V.V., Polyaev Yu.A. Spontannaya regressiya gemangiom kozhi u detey. V kn.: Peredovye tekhnologii meditsiny na styke vekov [Spontaneous regression of skin hemangiomas in children. In: Advanced medical technologies at the turn of the century]. Moscow; 2000; p. 363–366.
  6. Butorina A.B., Polyaev Yu.A. New technologies in treatment of pediatric hemangiomas. Detskaya bol’nitsa 2001; 1: 44–48.
  7. Butorina A.B., Polyaev Yu.A., Shafranov V.V., Vel’skaya Yu.I., Vozdvizhenskiy I.S. Hormonal treatment of major and deep hemangiomas in children. Voprosy gematologii, onkologii i immunologii v pediatrii 2004; 3(2): 55–58.
  8. Shafranov V.V., Polyaev Yu.A., Prityko A.G., Solenov V.I., Butorina A.B., Tsyganov D.I., Arkharov A.M. Nekotorye teoreticheskie aspekty primeneniya novykh tekhnicheskikh sredstv: v kriokhirurgii gemangiom u detey. V kn.: Peredovye tekhnologii meditsiny na styke vekov [Some theoretical aspects of using new technical means in hemangioma cryosurgery in children. In: Advanced medical technologies at the turn of the century]. Moscow; 2000; p. 347–350.
  9. Roginskiy V.V., Nadtochiy A.G., Grigoryan A.S., et al. Vascular maxillofacial and neck masses in children — a new view. Stomatologiya 2011; 90(4): 71–76.
  10. Richard J.А. Infantile hemangioma, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1083849-overview.
  11. Golovanov V.N., Pulikov A.C., Yurchuk B.A. Cryodestruction of ulcerous hemangiomas in children. Detskaya khirurgiya 2005; 5: 40–42.
  12. VIasov P.G. Selective coagulation of facial vascular lesions with Yachroma-M copper vapor laser. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya 2001; 7(3): 100–104.
Ryzhevskiy D.V., Trubin V.V., Durnovo Е.А. The Use of Selective Photothermolysis with Sclerosing to Treat Congenital and Neonatal Vascular Maxillofacial Hyperplasia in Children. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2014; 6(4): 145


Journal in Databases

pubmed_logo.jpg

web_of_science.jpg

scopus.jpg

crossref.jpg

ebsco.jpg

embase.jpg

ulrich.jpg

cyberleninka.jpg

e-library.jpg

lan.jpg

ajd.jpg

SCImago Journal & Country Rank